Chris Brown:My tat's not Rihanna or an abused woman!!!
Images of Breezy’s new ink circulated on the internet ― caused a debate on what exactly the tattoo was .
If you cover one side up, it appears to be a beautiful woman and the other half appears to be something ugly. It probably represents something― maybe the coexistence of Love and hate, Good and evil,who knows!
I am not defending him but that doesn't look like a beaten woman to me! tho he should've just barred the idea of getting this kind of tattoo....what do you think??
The most common response was that Chris had tatted up Rihanna on his neck, just weeks before the two were spotted giving each other a hug at the MTV Video Music Awards.
However,Chris' rep said his tattoo is a sugar skull (associated with the Mexican celebration of the Day of the Dead) and a MAC cosmetics design he saw. It is not Rihanna or an abused woman as erroneously reported........so just chill people!
Even the tattoo artist said CB brought him the "sugar skull" design from a MAC ad.
Check out the tat after the cut
A combination of "sugar skull" and MAC cosmetics design
If you cover one side up, it appears to be a beautiful woman and the other half appears to be something ugly. It probably represents something― maybe the coexistence of Love and hate, Good and evil,who knows!
0 Response to "Chris Brown:My tat's not Rihanna or an abused woman!!!"
Thanks for visiting. Kindly use the below form to drop your comment:
Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the comment writers alone and does not reflect or represent the views of Clicksomemore.